That world no longer exists cleanly. The threat environment targeting critical infrastructure in 2025 includes coordinated drone swarms that can probe perimeter defenses from beyond the range of conventional response. It includes cyber-physical attacks that simultaneously compromise digital control systems and create physical access opportunities. It includes AI-enabled adversaries that can adapt attack patterns faster than human security teams operating within traditional command structures can respond. And it includes the specific challenge of securing not just operating nuclear facilities but the construction sites, supply chains, and supporting infrastructure that large-scale nuclear deployment requires.

The Nuclear Company just launched NOS Security to address exactly this environment and the platform it has built reflects a genuine rethinking of what nuclear infrastructure protection needs to look like rather than an incremental upgrade to what already exists.

Why Nuclear Security Modernization Cannot Wait

The timing of this launch is not coincidental. It reflects a convergence of threat environment developments and policy priorities that has made nuclear security modernization an urgent national concern rather than a long-term planning item.

Recent drone attacks near nuclear facilities abroad have demonstrated that the aerial threat to nuclear infrastructure is no longer theoretical. Autonomous systems capable of sophisticated surveillance, electronic warfare, and physical disruption are increasingly accessible to state and non-state actors operating with the intent to threaten energy infrastructure. The same technological trends that have made drones transformative in conventional military operations have made them a credible threat vector against the fixed, high-value targets that nuclear facilities represent.

Simultaneously, the scale of nuclear deployment that American energy policy now requires creates a security challenge that the industry has not previously had to address. President Trump’s explicit prioritization of nuclear energy expansion as a foundation for AI infrastructure, domestic manufacturing, national security, and economic competitiveness means that hundreds of gigawatts of new nuclear capacity need to be built, secured, and brought online on a timeline that makes security architecture a construction-phase requirement rather than a commissioning-phase addition.

Jonathan Webb, CEO of The Nuclear Company, framed the policy context directly: the United States cannot deploy hundreds of gigawatts of nuclear power without simultaneously raising the security standard for the industry. That statement is not rhetorical. It reflects the arithmetic of what large-scale nuclear deployment actually requires not just reactor construction and grid integration, but the security infrastructure capable of protecting those assets across their full lifecycle from ground-breaking to decommissioning.

The Leadership Behind NOS Security

The credibility of a security platform is inseparable from the credibility of the people who built it. NOS Security’s leadership team brings a combination of nuclear-specific experience and operational security depth that is worth examining specifically.

Mike Marty, Vice President of Security at The Nuclear Company, brings the perspective of someone who has built security infrastructure for some of the most complex industrial environments outside the nuclear sector. As the former head of security for Tesla’s Gigafactory network, Marty has direct experience designing and implementing security systems for large-scale, high-value manufacturing facilities operating under significant threat pressure environments where physical security, cyber defense, and insider threat management intersect in ways that closely parallel the nuclear security challenge.

Edward Doby, Director of Nuclear Security, brings domain-specific depth that is difficult to replicate. Doby led physical security, safeguards, access authorization, and construction security programs at Southern Nuclear for Vogtle Units 3 and 4 the most recent large-scale nuclear construction project completed in the United States and one of the most complex security infrastructure challenges the industry has faced in decades. He also served as a Force Reconnaissance Team Leader in the United States Marine Corps and is a recipient of the Bronze Star Medal with the “V” device for valor. Both Marty and Doby are decorated Marine Corps veterans.

That combination Gigafactory-scale industrial security experience and Vogtle-scale nuclear construction security experience, both led by people with military special operations backgrounds is not accidental. It reflects a deliberate effort to build a security leadership team capable of operating credibly across the full range of challenges that modern nuclear infrastructure protection requires.

What NOS Security Actually Is

NOS Security is described as an integrated cyber-physical security platform a term that deserves unpacking because it reflects a specific architectural philosophy that distinguishes this approach from conventional nuclear security systems.

Conventional nuclear security architecture tends to treat cyber and physical security as parallel but separate domains. Physical security manages perimeter protection, access control, and armed response. Cyber security manages network defense, control system protection, and digital threat monitoring. The two domains communicate, but they are typically managed through separate command structures with separate situational awareness systems.

The cyber-physical integration model that NOS Security is built around treats these as a single unified problem rather than two adjacent ones. An attack that begins in the cyber domain compromising access control systems, disabling sensor networks, creating blind spots in monitoring coverage creates physical consequences that require physical response. A physical intrusion attempt may be coordinated with simultaneous cyber interference designed to degrade the security team’s situational awareness at the critical moment. Defending against either requires a command infrastructure that sees both simultaneously and can coordinate response across both domains in real time.

NOS Security’s platform architecture combines AI-enabled monitoring, autonomous drones and robotics, advanced sensing systems, unified command infrastructure, cyber defense, and real-time threat intelligence into a single integrated system. The autonomous drone and robotics capability is particularly significant given the aerial threat environment responding to drone threats with drone-based detection and response capability rather than relying solely on ground-based systems that were designed before the aerial threat became a primary concern.

Regulatory Alignment and the NRC Framework

Nuclear security in the United States operates within a specific regulatory framework that any credible security platform must align with and NOS Security’s design reflects that alignment rather than treating regulatory compliance as an afterthought.

The platform is designed to align with Nuclear Regulatory Commission requirements under 10 CFR 73.54, which governs cyber security for nuclear power plants, and 10 CFR 73.55, which establishes physical protection requirements for nuclear facilities. Both regulations define the minimum standards that licensed nuclear facilities must meet and both were written before the current threat environment made drone attacks, AI-enabled adversaries, and coordinated cyber-physical warfare the primary concerns they are today.

That regulatory context matters for understanding what NOS Security is designed to accomplish. Compliance with 10 CFR 73.54 and 73.55 is the floor, not the ceiling. The threat environment that nuclear facilities face in 2025 has moved significantly ahead of the regulatory framework designed to address it. A security platform that merely meets regulatory minimums is not adequate for the current threat landscape. NOS Security’s architecture is designed to exceed those requirements while maintaining the compliance documentation and audit trail that NRC licensing demands.

The alignment with Nuclear Energy Institute guidance adds the industry standards layer that sits between regulatory requirements and facility-specific security planning ensuring that NOS Security’s approach is compatible with the established frameworks that nuclear utilities, operators, and regulators use to evaluate and validate security programs.

Construction Security – The Overlooked Vulnerability

One of the most important and least discussed dimensions of NOS Security’s focus is construction site security the protection of nuclear facilities during the building phase before they reach operational status.

Nuclear construction sites represent a specific and underappreciated security challenge. They are large, complex, multi-party environments where thousands of workers, hundreds of contractors, and enormous quantities of critical equipment are concentrated in a location that is not yet protected by the full security infrastructure of a licensed operating facility. The physical perimeter is more permeable. The access control systems are less mature. The cyber infrastructure connecting construction management systems is less hardened than the operational systems it will eventually support.

The Vogtle Units 3 and 4 construction program which Lee Doby’s background directly addresses demonstrated that construction security at the scale required for large reactor projects is a specialized discipline that requires dedicated expertise and purpose-built systems. As The Nuclear Company’s development activities scale toward large reactor campuses, the construction security challenge scales proportionally.

NOS Security is initially being deployed to support The Nuclear Company’s own construction and development activities making it simultaneously a product being offered to the broader nuclear industry and a capability being validated in live deployment at the company’s own facilities. That Customer Zero approach, similar to what has been observed in other major industrial AI deployments, generates real-world performance data that external customers can evaluate rather than relying on simulated or laboratory validation.

The Broader Deployment Vision

NOS Security is positioned as part of The Nuclear Company’s broader NOS platform initiative a comprehensive effort to modernize nuclear deployment through AI-enabled construction management, facility coordination, supply chain oversight, and infrastructure protection.

The security platform fits within that broader vision as the protection layer that makes everything else viable. AI-enabled construction systems, advanced reactor designs, and accelerated deployment timelines all depend on the security foundation being adequate to protect what is being built. A nuclear deployment program that moves faster than its security architecture can accommodate is not actually moving faster it is accumulating risk that will eventually constrain the pace of deployment more severely than a slower, security-first approach would have.

The plan to work alongside existing nuclear utilities and allied partners seeking to modernize their security architectures extends NOS Security’s potential impact beyond new construction. The existing fleet of operating nuclear facilities in the United States and among allied nations faces the same threat environment evolution that is driving new deployment security requirements. Modernizing the security architecture of operating facilities without disrupting their licensed status and continuous operation is a different but equally important challenge that NOS Security’s platform is positioned to address.

Mike Marty captured the operational reality that drives all of this: traditional security models alone are no longer sufficient. Nuclear infrastructure requires integrated, technology-enabled defense systems capable of real-time detection, assessment, coordination, and response. That requirement is not aspirational. It is a response to a threat environment that has already demonstrated its capabilities against critical infrastructure targets globally and that will continue to evolve regardless of whether the security systems protecting nuclear facilities evolve alongside it.

The United States is making a generational bet on nuclear energy as a foundation for economic competitiveness, national security, and the energy demands of an AI-driven economy. That bet requires not just building reactors it requires building the security infrastructure capable of protecting them across decades of operation in a threat environment that none of us can fully predict. NOS Security is the beginning of that infrastructure. What gets built on top of it will matter for a very long time.

Research and Intelligence Sources: The Nuclear Company, Nuclear Regulatory Commission, CISA ICS, Department of Energy CESER, MITRE ATT&CK for ICS

To participate in our interviews, please write to our CyberTech Media Room at info@intentamplify.com